These days, you would be hard pressed to find someone who hasn’t heard or experienced the words climate change. The implications of this global phenomenon seem to be as ominous as they are widespread. It’s easy to feel helpless when confronted with the impact of this increase in average temperatures across the planet.
But what if it were possible to reverse a large-scale environmental disaster? Would that give us hope? Just such a recovery has already taken place in Central Asia. Let’s begin with some history….
The Sea as It Was Meant to Be
One hundred years ago, the fourth largest inland lake in the world was located in Russia, between what is now the southern part of Kazakhstan and northern Uzbekistan. Geologists estimate that the Aral Sea formed about 5.5 million years ago, fed by the Syr Darya river to the north and Amu Darya river to the south. It covered 28,000 square miles and contained a mild 10 grams of salt per liter (g/l).
By the mid-twentieth century, the fishing industry of the Aral Sea supported thousands of families in 19 villages and two cities. More than 40,000 tons of fish each year were processed by canneries and transported by train to surrounding regions.
In addition to the thriving human population, the Aral Sea also contained numerous species of fish, birds, and other wildlife. This healthy ecosystem was placed in jeopardy in 1918, when authorities in the former Soviet Union decided to divert water from the Syr Darya and Amu Darya to irrigate nearby deserts. They envisioned creating an agricultural economy of wheat, rice, melons, and cotton, all profitable but thirsty crops.
By the 1960s, the number of cultivated acres had risen from 6.4 to 15.9 million. Unfortunately, with its two major inflows redirected, the Aral Sea began to shrink.
From 1961 to 1970, the Aral Sea’s depth fell an average of 20 centimeters per year. In the following decade, the rate sped up to 50 to 60 centimeters per year. As the lake continued to disappear, more water was taken for irrigation, with the amount doubling from 1960 to 2000. Despite 30 to 75 percent of the water being lost to leakage or evaporation, Uzbekistan became the world’s largest exporter of cotton in 1988. The cost of this agricultural success was that the Aral Sea forfeited nine-tenths of its original volume.
The Amu Darya, the sea’s primary source, now ends 70 miles short of the lakeshore, with rain and ground water unable to make up the shortfall. With an increase in salinity to 30 g/l, all 24 species of native fish died out. Over 60,000 jobs were lost.
As the water receded, the lake split into two sections in 1986. Five years later, the Soviet Union collapsed. In order to address the plague of dust storms, summer heat, and health ailments in areas around the sea, a newly independent Kazakhstan permitted the construction of a dam to preserve the entirety of the Syr Darya’s inflow for the northern half of the lake. By 2005, the World Bank and national government were persuaded to contribute $85 million for an 8-mile dam and improvements to irrigation canals.
Scientists predicted that the water level would not reach the top of the new dam for 5 years. Instead, in a stunning victory for Mother Nature, water was spilling over the dam in 8 months. The Northern Aral grew by 20 percent, which reduced salinity levels to 14 g/l.
Over 300 square miles of dry lakebed are now under water, owing to the 80-foot rise in lake level. Native plants, fish and birds have reappeared. The fishing industry has seen yearly catches back in the thousands of tons, such that two fish processing plants have reopened.
Although the shore of the Northern Aral still lies 12 miles from its former primary harbor, the Kazakhi government has pledged $250 million to reconnect them through a series of locks and canals. The money for this immense project will come from oil money, as Kazakhstan is expected to become one of the world’s top oil-producing countries by 2020.
People are returning to live in the area, and they are feeling hopeful about the future. The Aral Sea’s rescue serves as an example to us that it’s better to go with the flow than to throw in the towel.
Have a change to suggest for this story? We’d love for you to submit it!